The Anglo-German Naval Agreement of 1935 was a significant milestone in the policy of appeasement in the lead up to World War II. The agreement was signed by Germany and Great Britain on June 18, 1935, and it allowed Germany to build up its navy to 35 percent of the size of the British navy.
The policy of appeasement was a strategy employed by the British government in the 1930s to try to avoid another world war. This strategy was characterized by a willingness to compromise and make concessions to Germany to prevent it from becoming too aggressive and starting a war. The Anglo-German Naval Agreement was a prime example of this policy, as it allowed Germany to build up its navy, which had been severely restricted by the Treaty of Versailles after World War I.
The agreement was seen as a significant concession by the British government, which was hoping to avoid a confrontation with Germany. However, the agreement was also criticized by many as being a sign of weakness and a capitulation to Hitler`s aggressive expansionist policies.
The agreement allowed Germany to build up its navy to 35 percent of the size of the British navy, which was a significant increase from the restrictions placed on Germany after World War I. In exchange, Germany promised not to build any more submarines or aircraft carriers, and to limit the size of its navy to a maximum of 35 percent of the British navy`s size.
The Anglo-German Naval Agreement was seen as a significant victory for Hitler, who had been calling for Germany to be allowed to build up its navy. It was also seen as a significant failure of the policy of appeasement, as it did little to prevent Germany from continuing its aggressive expansionist policies.
In conclusion, the Anglo-German Naval Agreement of 1935 was a prime example of the policy of appeasement employed by the British government in the 1930s. The agreement allowed Germany to build up its navy, which was a significant concession by the British government. However, the agreement did little to prevent Germany from continuing its aggressive policies, and it was seen as a failure of the policy of appeasement.